-
Individual question completion functionality VS current section completion only
Problem Statement Organizations with multiple Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and reviewers often collaborate across different time zones and schedules. Today, once a section is assigned for review, individual questions within that section remain editable until the entire section is completed. This creates challenges when…
-
AI-Generated Answers from Content/Document Library During Q&A Creation
Feature Request Enable AI to generate answers directly from attached documents or documents stored in the Content / Document Library while creating a new Q&A pair. Similar to the new feature project documents for AI. Problem Statement Today, when creating a new Q&A pair, users cannot instruct AI to reference a specific…
-
Bulk answer-type edits across sections are not supported
State Street has requested for this Enhancement Users can bulk edit within a section, but not across sections.
-
Answering page does not clearly separate multiple questionnaires (as it does in Section View)
State Street has requested this Enhancement When multiple files are imported, users want to distinguish them by imported file name in answering page. They would like to View by imported file name.
-
Grid view cannot expand all sections at once
State Street has requested for this Enhancement Users want a list-view-like ability to show individual sections or all sections in grid view. We Should give the option as we have in list view to look at individual sections or all sections .
-
Save & Next button not available in grid view
State Street has suggested this Enhancement idea Team expected a Save & Next control for faster reviewing. Currently there is no workaround beyond current navigation. We’re missing that button here
-
Sub-questions are not clearly indicated in grid view
State Street has suggested this Enhancement idea Grid view lacks the arrow/indicator that shows a question is a sub-question. Currently , there is no indicator at all
-
Project-level tags requested instead of org-level tags
State Street Requested for this enhancement Client has requested for tags/flags to be customizable by project; current tags are org-level. Current workaround of Use the standard tag format in the interim (SME1 / SME2) is not ideal. We should think about adding tags at a project level
-
Export of Archived Records
Enhancement Request Description: Customers currently cannot export records directly from the Archive. To export archived records, they must first move the records back to the Content Library, apply temporary tags or collections to keep track of them, perform the export, and then rearchive the records afterward. This…
-
Feature Request: Improve End-to-End PDF Questionnaire Support
Summary Improve the end-to-end experience for customers working with PDF-based questionnaires by addressing limitations in both PDF import and PDF export. Many customers receive RFPs and questionnaires exclusively in PDF format. While Responsive supports PDF workflows, current limitations require manual intervention during…