-
Review email should list all assigned reviewers for every review type
Problem:The current review email does not consistently show the full set of assigned reviewers. That makes it harder for recipients to understand who is involved in the review and what their role is. Requested change:List all assigned reviewers in the review email, regardless of whether the review type is sequential, any,…
-
Tasks closed after "Any" review task complete at question-level (closes task for all users assigned
State Street Requested Enhancement When a review is configured as “ANY” and multiple reviewers are assigned, the review is considered complete once a single reviewer finishes the task. However, the remaining assigned reviewers continue receiving task notifications because their individual tasks remain open. Request:…
-
“Last Reviewed” indicator to signify that Q+A pair Metadata was changed
Content Review Visibility and “Last Reviewed” Indicator Requested by ENT customers: Genetec, O.C. Tanner Problem / Current State When content is opened for review and only metadata is updated (tags, keywords, SME assignments, etc.), the “Last Updated” date does not change. From a reviewer and writer perspective, this…
-
Allow Editing Reviewers on Active On-Demand Reviews
Requested by ENT customer: Genetec Summary: When using On-Demand Reviews, users cannot add, remove, or change reviewers once the review has been created. If a reviewer change is needed, the only workaround is to cancel the review and recreate it, which introduces risk, rework, and workflow disruption. Customer Problem /…
-
Automatically Complete Section Reviews When All Assigned Questions Are Reviewed
Customer: Federated Hermes Problem Statement Reviewers are confused by the current two-step review process within Projects. After reviewing every assigned question in a section, the section itself remains “In Progress” until the reviewer manually clicks the “Complete Section” button. Because there is no clear indication…
-
ANY/ALL/SEQUENTIAL process for project authorship
State Street has requested ANY/ALL/SEQUENTIAL process for project authorship. They would like to see the same functionality that we have for the answer review process, but for those authoring the answers to project questions.
-
Tracked Changes/Revisions in Content Review - State Street
When multiple users are reviewing a record, there's a chance that the second reviewer undoes the first person's changes. State Street would like the edits that one user makes to be visible to another user in review. The 'Activities' view does not encompass all revisions, but rather each individual revision separately. We…
-
Addition of Different Due Dates within Sequential Review
AQR Capital has noted the increase in clarity and efficiency that would be gained from the enhancement of the Sequential Review feature to allow the assignment of separate de dates to each individual Reviewer in the sequence. This would ensure first line reviewers don't see a generous looking due date, and wait until the…
-
Review Type Visibility at Question-Level for users without "Update Section" Permissions
The customer is using mixed review processes within the same section (e.g., Any, All, and Sequential reviews assigned across different questions). In these scenarios, the section-level review process displays as “Custom” under Properties rather than exposing the specific review type assigned to each individual question.…
-
Ability to display warning pop-up message while completing review for ANY and ALL Review processes.
In Projects, the reviewers do not receive a warning pop-up when clicking the "Complete Review" button without toggling all questions as reviewed, risking premature closure of review sections across multiple projects. The engineering team confirmed that the warning pop-up message is currently only implemented for Custom…