-
“Last Reviewed” indicator to signify that Q+A pair Metadata was changed
Content Review Visibility and “Last Reviewed” Indicator Requested by ENT customers: Genetec, O.C. Tanner Problem / Current State When content is opened for review and only metadata is updated (tags, keywords, SME assignments, etc.), the “Last Updated” date does not change. From a reviewer and writer perspective, this…
-
Allow Editing Reviewers on Active On-Demand Reviews
Requested by ENT customer: Genetec Summary: When using On-Demand Reviews, users cannot add, remove, or change reviewers once the review has been created. If a reviewer change is needed, the only workaround is to cancel the review and recreate it, which introduces risk, rework, and workflow disruption. Customer Problem /…
-
Ability to display warning pop-up message while completing review for ANY and ALL Review processes.
In Projects, the reviewers do not receive a warning pop-up when clicking the "Complete Review" button without toggling all questions as reviewed, risking premature closure of review sections across multiple projects. The engineering team confirmed that the warning pop-up message is currently only implemented for Custom…
-
Projects - Retain Review History After Section is Closed and Reopened
I am submitting this enhancement request on behalf of our strategic client, Microsoft. Request: We request that when a previously closed project section is reopened for edits, the system preserves all historical review data, including the green check marks next to reviewer icons. Current Issue: Reopening a section…
-
Reopen a completed project section, and maintain previous reviews
We had a request from a client for the need to re-open a completed project section, and maintain previous reviews; i.e., not remove the reviews, but maintain the reviews that have already been done and allow editing. The need stems from a scenario where the client wanted to go back into a completed section of a project to…
-
Auto date set when adding review should be editable to farther out than 1 week
The default date when editing appears as one week. This should be editable in org settings upon the request of client Cliftonlarsenallen
-
Automatic Updating of “Review Date” Custom Field
ADP has suggested the following enhancement around Review Date tracking: Problem “Review Date” is a custom field used by ADP to measure engagement and content recency. Content owners often review an item but do not modify the content, so the review date does not change. This results in stale or misleading content health…
-
Addition of Different Due Dates within Sequential Review
AQR Capital has noted the increase in clarity and efficiency that would be gained from the enhancement of the Sequential Review feature to allow the assignment of separate de dates to each individual Reviewer in the sequence. This would ensure first line reviewers don't see a generous looking due date, and wait until the…
-
Author-Level Review Tracking and Checkmark Functionality at Question Level
Elevance's previous system allowed subject matter experts (SMEs) to track and sign off on their individual contributions at the question level, not just the section level. In Responsive, they find this workflow challenging because current review and tracking capabilities operate primarily at the section level, or via flags…
-
Tracked Changes/Revisions in Content Review - State Street
When multiple users are reviewing a record, there's a chance that the second reviewer undoes the first person's changes. State Street would like the edits that one user makes to be visible to another user in review. The 'Activities' view does not encompass all revisions, but rather each individual revision separately. We…