-
To send bulk reminders to users with overdue review content
This request is from Axonius. They would like to have the option to send bulk reminders to users with overdue review content. They also added that their previous tool - Loopio, allowed users to Nudge/Remind reviewers directly on an entry along with bulk entries at one time.
-
The Facet and advanced search filters should provide consistent information when filtering and apply
Current behavior: When filtering certain information, such as Project Name, from the advanced filter, the corresponding options in the facet do not automatically get selected. This requires users to select the filters again from the facet view, leading to confusion regarding the numbers and the filters applied. It would be…
-
PROD-I-829 Undo bulk changes in content library
From Microsoft. Now that bulk actions are easier to perform in the new UI, this raises concern of a higher chance of accidents with wide-reaching complications. They'd like to be able to quickly "Undo" a bulk action if they notice it was a mistake Created date : 2022-11-10 Votes : 2 Comments for the idea :…
-
Pure Storage - Ability to edit QA pair in review queue before Moderation
"Currently, editing a QA pair that has been reviewed and is in the queue for moderation may not be supported directly through the standard workflow. However, we understand the need for this functionality. " — Notes from Support Pure Storage needs the ability to do this as it's a kink in their workflow today.
-
PII Check when Staging/Uploading content to the CL
Bring in the ability to identify and then mask or replace PII in a customer's historical data/RFx when uploading the content to the CL. If we can replace the PII with Mergetags (auto suggest based on context would be the best, else offer a manual set of choices to replace the PII with), it makes the same that much more…
-
All users content to go through moderation, with the exception of some roles
Hi Team, Idea from Computacenter. I don't know how feasible this would be as it would be disruptive to other customers, but they would like a way to have all users' content go through moderation, and just have a couple role be an exception to that. This is the opposite of how it is built currently. Thanks, Bruce
-
A "did you mean"? Feature in the content libary
Hi Team, Atlassian brought this idea up. It would be useful for typos, and make searching a little easier. Might be doable if we made prowriting aid available in the search. Thanks so much, Bruce
-
Warning message misleading when bulk deleting
When we try to bulk delete the QA pairs in content library, it shows a warning message that 'Some of the selected items will not be deleted as those are either in moderation or review, or you do not have delete permissions.' even though none of the contents are in moderation, review or have any permission issue. Client:…
-
Renaming custom field removes the association with contents in Content Library.
When we make edits or rename a custom field value in the Organization Settings, the value that is associated with Q&A pairs in CCL gets removed. For example, we have a custom field named “VPC Funds” that has a value “VSL”. There are QA pairs in CCL with this value. If we edit/rename this value from “VSL to VSL I”, the…
-
Option to have select all under Advanced search of content library
Current behavior: Under the Content Library's advanced search, if you need to filter tags or collections, you will have to manually check the options in the dropdown to include or exclude specific tags and collections. Expected behavior: To improve the user experience in the Content Library's advanced search, it would be…