I'm interested leveraging the Moderation tool but would like to know if there are any best-practices before turning it on. How are folks using it currently?
Here are a few reasons folks may want to turn on moderation:
The biggest piece of advice I can offer as a CSM is that if you do enable it be sure you don't let QA pairs pile up in the moderation queue. If it's not something you have the bandwidth to check daily, schedule 15 - 30 minutes a week to go in and manage it. Not keeping up with the queue means that some quality content may not be making it into the library, or that existing content isn't reflecting possible updates.
Bonus: When you use moderation, you can also view comments. You can act on the comments and then resolve and delete them to clean up the content before you click Accept.
I've started using the Moderation feature more regularly this year and what I find great about it (other than protecting the Q/A pairings in your current library), it can also help merge similar questions/answers so that the Answer Library is less clutter and repetitive.
We use it to make sure we have everything tagged properly before adding them to the library.
Moderation should be required! We depend on SMEs for content accuracy, then use moderation for final checks before moving Q&A pairs to the "active" library for general usage. In addition to duplicate/similar checks, moderation checks include readability, formatting (copy & paste often pulls in unwanted formatting), adherence to the company style guide, tags, owners, collections, star rating, and review dates.
This is no ordinary roadshow — it’s a full-throttle afternoon of expert keynotes, AI innovation, and high-voltage networking with the legends of bid and proposal. Get ready to: ✔️ Turn AI buzz into business results ✔️ See what’s new in the Responsive Platform ✔️ Connect with SRM visionaries and peers And the best part?…
What are Responsive's AI capabilities?
GRC software: What should I look for?
What Does a Knowledge Management Platform Do? | Responsive